TL;DR
Get smart everyday buys delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Lloyds Bank research puts the average UK home at 7.3 times median earnings, down from 7.6 in 2025 and the lowest ratio since 2015. The improvement measures house prices against earnings; Lloyds says higher mortgage costs are still squeezing buyers.
UK house price affordability has reached an 11-year high, with the average home costing 7.3 times median earnings, according to new research by Lloyds Bank. The ratio was 7.6 in 2025 and is now at its lowest level since 2015, although higher mortgage costs continue to squeeze buyers.
The measure compares the average price of a UK home with median earnings. At 7.3 times earnings, the ratio indicates that house prices have become less stretched against incomes than they were in 2025, when the figure stood at 7.6. Lloyds describes the current level as the lowest in 11 years.
The figures do not mean that homes have become affordable for every household, or that buyers’ monthly costs have fallen. The research summary also says that higher mortgage costs remain a pressure. The price-to-earnings ratio captures the relationship between two measures; it does not by itself show the deposit needed, the mortgage rate available or the amount a particular buyer can borrow.
The reported figures are national averages. The available details do not give regional breakdowns, the data period used to calculate the average home price and median earnings, or the size of the underlying changes in either measure. Those details would help show how widely the improvement is shared and what has driven the lower ratio.
House price affordability hits an 11-year high
The average UK home costs 7.3 times median earnings, down from 7.6 in 2025. It is the lowest ratio since 2015, though higher mortgage costs still squeeze buyers.
Average UK home price compared with median earnings
A lower ratio does not mean monthly mortgage payments are easier to manage.
Home price to median earnings
Previous reported comparison
Lowest level in the reported series
Ratio points versus 2025
A more favourable ratio
The comparison shows the average home is less expensive relative to median earnings than it was in 2025. Lloyds describes 7.3× as the lowest level since 2015.
Average home price relative to median earnings
Lower than 2025; the lowest reading since 2015
What the ratio tells buyers
Price-to-earnings is one part of affordability. It compares home values with income, but does not calculate what a particular household can borrow or pay each month.
Homes relative to income
The average home now costs fewer times median earnings than in 2025, a more favourable signal for buyers.
Mortgage costs
Lloyds says higher borrowing costs continue to squeeze buyers, even as the headline ratio falls.
Budgets differ
Deposits, local prices, rates, loan size, repayment terms and personal income shape a buyer’s actual affordability.
Why a better ratio can coexist with pressure
The ratio captures the relationship between average home prices and median earnings. A mortgage payment also depends on financing conditions and the buyer’s circumstances.
“The average UK home costs 7.3 times median earnings, down from 7.6 in 2025.”
Lloyds Bank research · Price relative to earningsBorrowing costs still matter
A lower price-to-income ratio is evidence of relative improvement. By itself, it does not show that financing a home has become easy or that payments have fallen.
A national average, not a household verdict
The available summary supports a lower national ratio than in 2025 and a lowest-since-2015 reading. It does not explain how widely the change is shared or what drove it.
Details needed for a fuller picture
Regional comparisons and methodology would show how the national figure was compiled. Mortgage, deposit and repayment data would help connect the ratio to the costs buyers face.
What to check next
A clearer view of affordability comes from connecting the headline ratio to local markets and real borrowing costs.
Read the full research
Check the exact data period and how prices and earnings were measured.
Compare regions
See whether the national shift appears across local housing markets.
Track borrowing costs
Put mortgage rates, deposits and repayments alongside the ratio.
Assess the real budget
Use local prices and personal finances to judge an individual purchase.
Affordability, answered
What does 7.3× mean?
The average UK home costs 7.3 times median earnings, according to Lloyds Bank research. It is not an estimate of a specific buyer’s mortgage payment.
Why call it an 11-year high?
The ratio is at its lowest level since 2015. The phrase describes improved affordability relative to earnings.
Does this make buying affordable?
Not necessarily. Mortgage costs remain a pressure, and deposits, rates, local prices and household income also matter.
How does it compare with 2025?
The ratio fell from 7.6× to 7.3×. The available details do not show how much came from price changes versus earnings.
Does the figure apply equally across the UK?
It is a national average. No regional breakdown is included in the available summary.
What would help buyers judge the change?
Regional and historical data, plus comparable mortgage rates, deposit requirements and repayment figures.
What the Lower Ratio Means for Buyers
A lower price-to-earnings ratio suggests that the gap between typical earnings and home prices has narrowed. For prospective buyers, that is a more favourable signal than a rising ratio: prices, earnings, or both have shifted in a way that leaves the average home less expensive relative to median income than in 2025. Lloyds’ figures do not specify which part of that relationship accounts for the change.
However, the ratio is only one part of the affordability picture. Mortgage payments depend on borrowing costs, loan size and repayment terms, while buyers also need to meet deposit and other purchase costs. Lloyds’ warning that mortgage costs remain high means the headline improvement should not be read as proof that financing a home has become easy. A buyer may face a more favourable price-to-income comparison and still struggle to meet monthly repayments.
The distinction matters for households deciding whether to buy, wait or adjust their budget. A national ratio can provide a broad indicator, but it cannot tell a reader what a property costs in a specific area or whether their income and savings are sufficient for a lender’s requirements. The figure is best understood as evidence of a relative improvement, not a guarantee of improved affordability for individual buyers.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Affordability Measure Has Shifted
The comparison reported by Lloyds is between the present reading and the 2025 figure: the average home moved from 7.6 times median earnings to 7.3. Lloyds says the new level is the lowest since 2015, giving the development a longer historical reference point than the year-on-year change alone.
House-price affordability is often discussed through several different measures. The price-to-earnings ratio describes the relationship between home values and income, while the cost of a mortgage also reflects interest rates and the amount borrowed. The reported result concerns the first of these. The accompanying caveat about higher mortgage costs points to why a better ratio and difficult conditions for buyers can coexist.
The information provided does not include the full research methodology, a precise publication date, regional figures or a longer sequence of annual readings. It therefore supports the specific conclusion that the ratio is lower than in 2025 and at its lowest point since 2015, but not a broader claim that affordability has improved consistently across the UK or for every type of buyer.
“The average UK home costs 7.3 times median earnings, down from 7.6 in 2025 and at its lowest point since 2015.”
— Lloyds Bank research
first-time homebuyer mortgage guide
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the National Figure Leaves Out
The available research summary does not specify the exact data period, how the average home price and median earnings were calculated, or whether the figures are based on a particular set of buyers or properties. It also provides no regional comparisons, so it is unclear whether the lower ratio applies broadly or is concentrated in some parts of the UK.
It is also not clear how much of the change from 7.6 to 7.3 reflects movements in house prices versus earnings. No mortgage-rate data, typical monthly payment figures or deposit requirements are included. For those reasons, the headline ratio cannot establish how much easier it is for a household to buy now than in 2025.
high-yield savings account for home savings
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Further Data Needed to Judge Affordability
The next useful detail will be the full Lloyds research, including its methodology and any regional or time-series breakdowns. Those would show how the national figure was compiled and whether the change is visible across different local housing markets.
Buyers will also need to track mortgage costs alongside house prices and earnings. Until comparable information on borrowing rates, deposits and repayments is available, the 7.3 ratio remains a measure of homes relative to income—not a complete account of the costs facing a buyer.
Source: rss
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What does the 7.3 figure mean?
It means the average UK home costs 7.3 times median earnings, according to Lloyds Bank research. It is a comparison of home prices with income, not a measure of a particular household’s mortgage payment.
Why is the figure described as an 11-year high?
Lloyds says the ratio is at its lowest level since 2015. The wording refers to an improvement in affordability relative to earnings, rather than an increase in house prices.
Does this mean buying a home is now affordable?
Not necessarily. The ratio has improved, but Lloyds says higher mortgage costs continue to squeeze buyers. Deposits, borrowing rates, local prices and personal income also affect whether a purchase is affordable.
How does the current figure compare with 2025?
The average home cost 7.6 times median earnings in 2025, compared with 7.3 in the new research. The information provided does not break down how much of the difference came from house prices or earnings.
Does the figure apply equally across the UK?
The reported figure is a UK average. No regional breakdown is included in the available details, so it cannot show whether the improvement is shared equally across the country.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
